Modeling News Trust: A Defeasible Logic Programming Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Deciding whether to trust an information sources on the Web has been recognized as one of the main problems in today’s Information Society. In particular, assessing the credibility of news is a major research challenge. Typically, criteria such as freshness, relevance and viewer profile have been used by news services to rank news. However, these services do not deal with credibility from a qualitative perspective, and do not provide mechanisms to cope with controversial news reports. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel framework that brings the notions of trust and pluralism into play. In our proposal, we integrate dialectical reasoning into a news recommender system. The system is based on a set of basic principles characterizing the nature of trust. We use Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a general–purpose defeasible argumentation formalism based on logic programming, to model the notion of trust. Our approach helps identify antagonism among sources of news and facilitates the analysis of opposing positions.
منابع مشابه
An Argument-Based Approach to Cope with Trust and Pluralism in Web News Reports
Due to the huge amount of multi-source news that are available on the Web at any time, it is crucial to provide intelligent mechanisms to select and rank news reports. Over the last few years, a number of approaches based on criteria such as freshness, relevance and viewer profile have been proposed. However, most existing news processing services do not deal with credibility as a subjective no...
متن کاملModeling Defeasible Argumentation within a Possibilistic Logic Framework with Fuzzy Unification
Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (P-DeLP) is a logic programming language which combines features from argumentation theory and logic programming, incorporating the treatment of possibilistic uncertainty at object-language level. This paper presents a first approach towards extending P-DeLP to incorporate fuzzy constants and fuzzy propositional variables. We focus on how to characteri...
متن کاملSolving power and trust conflicts through argumentation in agent-mediated knowledge distribution
Distributing pieces of knowledge in large, usually distributed organizations is a central problem in Knowledge and Organization management. Policies for distributing knowledge and information are mostly incomplete or in potential conflict with each other. As a consequence, decision processes for information distribution may be difficult to formalize on the basis of a rationally justified proced...
متن کاملA Hybrid Approach To Pattern Classification Using Neural Networks and Defeasible Argumentation
Many classification systems rely on clustering techniques in which a collection of training examples is provided as an input, and a number of clusters c1, . . . cm modeling some concept C results as an output, such that every cluster ci is labeled as positive or negative. In such a setting clusters can overlap, and a new unlabeled instance can be assigned to more than one cluster with conflicti...
متن کاملA System for Nonmonotonic Rules on the Web
Defeasible reasoning is a rule-based approach for efficient reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information. Such reasoning is, among others, useful for ontology integration, where conflicting information arises naturally; and for the modeling of business rules and policies, where rules with exceptions are often used. This paper describes these scenarios in more detail, and reports on th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Inteligencia Artificial, Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008